01Overview

Services marketing,
where every concept is visible.

Every student takes over an 80-room independent on Marlin Bay’s resort coast — names it, then staffs, prices, and runs it for four seasonal quarters against four rival properties on the same strip. The product isn’t a thing in a box; it’s what happens at the front desk.

4 quarters
Individual play · 1 property each
4 auto-graded case studies
RevPAR · NPS · net profit

Maps to your syllabus

GAPSSERVQUAL · the five-gap quality model
7PsPeople · process · physical evidence
SPCService-Profit Chain · internal marketing
SRPService recovery paradox · empowerment
02Pedagogy

You can’t inventory a service.
That changes everything.

Goods marketing has four Ps; services has seven. A room-night unsold tonight is gone — capacity is a use-it-or-lose-it 7,200 room-nights a quarter — and the product is produced and consumed in the same moment, by people. Students don’t learn that from the textbook chapter; they learn it by watching Gap 3 widen the quarter they understaffed the summer peak.

Learning outcomes

LO1

Diagnose the five SERVQUAL gaps

Knowledge, standards, delivery, communication, perception — each gap is invisible until the right research reveals it.

LO2

Run the Service-Profit Chain

Internal investment → employee morale → service quality → guest satisfaction → loyalty → profit. Skip a link and the chain breaks.

LO3

Price a perishable product

Three room classes, seasonal demand, yield management — a room-night unsold tonight earns $0 forever.

LO4

Turn failures into loyalty

Failures are inevitable; empowerment is a line item. Recovered well, a failure can leave a guest more loyal than if nothing had gone wrong.

03The arc

Four quarters. One property. Nothing resets.

Each quarter asks the same seven-P decisions — rates, room mix, channels, promotion, staffing, standards, servicescape. What changes is the season: demand swings from a ×0.85 winter lull to a ×1.20 summer peak, and what carries over — loyalty seeded early, employees kept happy, gaps closed — decides who owns the peak when it arrives.

Demand ×0.85 → ×1.20 · loyalty compounds
1
Q1 · Establish

The Groundwork

Post-holiday lull — the lobby is quiet enough to hear the radiator. Set staffing, wages, positioning, and standards, and buy the Customer Expectations Audit. Every other investment is guesswork without it.

Case study this quarter

Ritz-Carlton · service standards, engineered not wished

2
Q2 · Diagnose

The Last Quiet Quarter

First results are in. Tune ADR, fix the room mix, buy the Mystery Shopper if Gap 3 or 4 looks wide. Spring travel returns — this is the last chance to fix process problems before peak.

Case study this quarter

Mandarin Oriental · internal marketing, the luxury service brand

3
Q3 · Maximize

The Peak

Summer surge — demand ×1.20. Push ADR to the top of segment tolerance and staff for the load: a 95%-full hotel with a lean team watches Gap 3 widen in public.

Case study this quarter

Marriott · yield management, the room that cannot be stored

4
Q4 · Defend

The Harvest

Holiday and corporate season. Harvest the loyalty you seeded in Q1 — this quarter rewards properties whose service held up all year. Behind? Size the bet you can afford to lose; there is no Q5.

Case study this quarter

Four Seasons · the Service-Profit Chain, the economics of loyalty

04The model

Five gaps.
Every one invisible by default.

Parasuraman, Zeithaml & Berry’s gap model is the spine of the course — and the sim’s diagnostic layer. Service quality never fails in general; it fails through one of five named breakdowns, and each one names the research or investment that closes it. Students stop saying “service was bad” and start saying which gap did it.

What students actually see

The gaps are taught in the briefing, bought or funded on the decision form, and reported as five scores on every results panel — so when satisfaction slips, students can locate it at a gap, not just a number.

Gap 1

Knowledge Gap

What management thinks guests want vs. what they actually want.

Closes via: Customer Expectations Audit

Gap 2

Standards Gap

Guest expectations vs. the service standards you set internally.

Closes via: Service standards (SOPs) investment

Gap 3

Delivery Gap

The standards you set vs. what your staff actually deliver on the floor.

Closes via: Mystery Shopper Audit · staffing, training

Gap 4

Communication Gap

What you promise in marketing vs. what you actually deliver.

Closes via: Mystery Shopper Audit · brand positioning

Gap 5

Perception Gap

Guest expectations vs. their perception of what they got — the sum of Gaps 1–4.

Closes via: NPS & review analysis

05Artifacts

What your students will hand in.

Every quarter produces a property state and a guest state you can review in the instructor dashboard. Case-study answers are submitted alongside and auto-graded against your answer key.

Decision snapshot · Q2
Sample student

Positioning & service delivery

Upscale positioning, aimed at Romance & Couples. Deluxe ADR to $310. Standard staffing at above-market wages; doubling training, funding recovery empowerment. Bought the Mystery Shopper Audit — Gap 3 looked wide.

Deluxe ADR

$310

Staffing

Standard

Wages

Above mkt

RevPAR · Q2Sample student
$159RevPAR
67% occupancy+$23 vs. Q1 · ADR $238

What the panel surfaces

“Gap 3 narrowed to 15 — the Mystery Shopper paid for itself. NPS 36, up four. One severe failure in the deluxe wing went unrecovered at −8; empowerment is still underfunded for peak load. Employee satisfaction 73 — the chain is starting to pull.”

06Adopt

See it the way
a student would.

The fastest way to evaluate the module is to take a guided tour of Quarter 1 — same brief, same decision form, same research dashboard, same results panel your students see, prepopulated with sample inputs so you can click through and read the reveal without grading your own work. We recommend doing it before assigning.

Already adopted? Open the instructor dashboard →

Course wizard

One class code — five-property pods open automatically as students join.

Individual play

Every student names and runs their own property in a five-hotel market.

Four case studies

Ritz-Carlton, Mandarin Oriental, Marriott, Four Seasons — auto-graded against your answer key.

Canvas-ready CSV

Export the full gradebook on demand.