01Overview

An introduction to marketing strategy,
taught by doing.

Students inherit a young consumer brand and ship a four-round marketing plan — segment, brand, price, promotion — graded by a coherence engine that rewards integrated thinking over isolated cleverness.

4 rounds
Individual play · 1 brand each
No prerequisites
Auto-graded · rubric exposed

Maps to your syllabus

STPSegmentation · Targeting · Positioning
4PsProduct · Price · Promotion · Place
BrandArchetypes · architecture · voice
IMCIntegrated marketing communication
02Pedagogy

Concepts hold up better
after a student misuses them.

The module is built around a single thesis you can lecture against — coherence beats cleverness. Students don’t learn the framework by reading it. They learn it by committing to a plan, watching the engine call out incoherence, and rewriting in the next round. The textbook then explains the mistake they already felt.

Learning outcomes

LO1

Apply STP to a defined market

Pick a segment, defend it, write the line that names the promise.

LO2

Translate brand into product

Archetype → personality → product decisions that hold the line.

LO3

Justify a pricing position

Choose a price band; show it is believable given the segment and brand.

LO4

Design an integrated launch

Mix earned, owned, paid, place — without breaking coherence.

03The arc

Four rounds. Each one inherits the last.

The dependency graph is the curriculum. Round 1’s segment choice constrains Round 2’s archetype space; Round 2’s archetype constrains Round 3’s plausible price band; Round 3’s price band constrains Round 4’s media mix. Students who pick scattershot in early rounds discover their Round 4 options are narrower than their classmates’.

4 rounds · each builds on the last
1
R1 · STP

The Anchor

Pick a product category, choose a target customer segment, draft a positioning statement, sketch a SWOT. Round 1 sets the bar every later round is graded against.

Students submit

Segment · positioning · SWOT

2
R2 · Product & Brand

The Personality

Carl Jung’s twelve brand archetypes, simplified to four. Translate the archetype into name, tagline, visual mood, and product decisions that hold the line on Round 1.

Students submit

Archetype · product mix · brand voice

3
R3 · Pricing

The Position

Set a price point and pick a strategy — premium, penetration, every-day-low-price (EDLP), or skim. Premium against a value-led segment is the most common mistake.

Students submit

Price band · value math · promo plan

4
R4 · Promotion & Place

The Voice

Allocate $50K across five promotional channels. Spreading evenly is the easy mistake; coherent campaigns concentrate on the 2–3 channels that match segment and archetype.

Students submit

IMC plan · channel mix · launch calendar

04Artifacts

What your students will hand in.

Every round produces gradeable artifacts you can review in the instructor dashboard and export as a Canvas-ready CSV when you’re done grading.

Positioning statement · R1
Sample student

The line

For ritual-driven skincare loyalists, NorthStar is the evening serum that earns its place on the shelf — because it actually does one thing and proves it in two weeks.

Specificity

88/100

Confidence

76/100

Proof

82/100

Coherence Score · R1Sample student
84/ 100
Strong tier+14 above class median

What the engine wrote

“Loyalist + skincare is canonical and the positioning earns the segment — the proof clause does the work most R1 positioning statements skip. SWOT under-weights regulatory threat, which will surface in R3.”

05Rubric

One score.
Four defensible reasons.

The Coherence Score is an aggregate of four dimensions, each calculated from the student’s own submitted artifacts. You can grade on the engine’s number, override it per-student, or run your own rubric on top — all four dimensions are visible to the student and to you.

Default weighting

Fit · 35Brand · 25Pos · 25SWOT · 15

Reweight in Course settings → Grading.

Segment Fit

Defensibility of the chosen segment given the product category. Did the student pick a customer the brand can actually serve?

35%

weight

Brand Coherence

Internal consistency of archetype, voice, and product decisions. Projected in R1, scored fully in R2.

25%

weight

Positioning

Specificity, confidence, and proof of the positioning line. Engine scores on syntactic and semantic markers.

25%

weight

SWOT clarity

Honest threat identification. Engine rewards naming threats that show up in later rounds.

15%

weight

06Adopt

See it the way
a student would.

The fastest way to evaluate the module is to take a guided tour of Round 1 — same brief, same decision form, same results UI your students see, prepopulated with sample inputs so you can click through and read the reveal without grading your own work. We recommend doing it before assigning.

Already adopted? Open the instructor dashboard →

Course wizard

Roster size auto-allocates sims and seats.

Individual play

Each student runs their own brand on their own schedule.

Auto-graded

Every point earned ties back to a named coherence rule.

Canvas-ready CSV

Export the full gradebook on demand.